Skip to content
Home » The Scientific Evidence of Harm from Wireless Radiation: Joel Moskowitz Ph.D.

The Scientific Evidence of Harm from Wireless Radiation: Joel Moskowitz Ph.D.

  • 5 min read

The Scientific Evidence of Harm from Wireless Radiation: Joel Moskowitz Ph.D.

In this video presentation,  Joel Moskowitz PhD, ICBE-EMF Commissioner, presents an overview of the scientific evidence on wireless radiation health effects. Wireless radiofrequency (RF) radiation is emitted from cell phones, cell towers, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, smartmeters, and anything wireless connected. 

“My name is Joel M. Moskowitz. For the past three decades, I have directed the Center for Family and Community Health at the University of California, Berkeley. In 2009, I became concerned about the effects of wireless radiation when my center co-authored a research review on mobile phone use and tumor risk, which we updated in 2020. For the past 11 years, I have disseminated research on wireless radiation health effects through my SaferEMR.com website.

So let me tell you why I am very concerned that governmental exposure limits for wireless radiation do not protect human health and ignore impacts on wildlife. In the 1990s, exposure limits for mobile phones and cell towers were adopted in the U.S. by the Federal Communications Commission. Many other countries adopted similar limits promoted by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, a German NGO. In 2020, these limits were reaffirmed and extended to higher-frequency emissions that come with fifth-generation wireless, known as 5G. These limits were reaffirmed without any 5G safety studies.

The current exposure limits assume that any biological effect at exposures above the generally accepted 4 watts per kilogram threshold is due to tissue heating. Yet many studies have found adverse biological and health effects with low-intensity exposure, which proves that 4 watts per kilogram is not the threshold for harmful effects.

This understanding led to the creation of the International EMF Scientist Appeal in 2015 and the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF) in 2021. We are challenging the current exposure limits because they are based on 14 problematic assumptions. For example, they erroneously assume that no adverse effects occur below 4 watts per kilogram. This so-called safety threshold was based on a behavioral change observed in studies conducted in the 1980s with small numbers of rats and monkeys exposed to wireless radiation for only an hour or less.

Numerous studies have found that wireless radiation is associated with various health effects, including cancer, DNA damage, sperm damage, heart disease, neurological disorders, and opening the blood-brain barrier to toxic contaminants. Multiple studies of cell phone users have found increased brain tumor risk, which is supported by evidence from animal studies of carcinogenicity in the same cell types.

Moreover, many people have developed electromagnetic hypersensitivity, a clinical syndrome that typically includes central nervous system symptoms such as headaches, insomnia, and poor concentration. Little information is available about the health effects of 4G or 5G radiation due to industry influence that has resulted in limited research funding.

ICBE-EMF and 250 EMF scientists who have published over 2,000 papers in professional journals urge governments to adopt more stringent exposure limits and urge individuals to reduce exposure. Last year, we published a paper that proposed six low-cost engineering fixes that could dramatically reduce our exposure to cell phone radiation. A written report with references, including personal safety tips to reduce exposure, is available at icbe-emf.org. For more information, see the links in the slides appended to this presentation.”

 

Key ICBE-EMF Publications

The ICBE-EMF paper “Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G,” published in Environmental Health, demonstrates how the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the International Commission on Nonionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) have ignored hundreds of scientific studies documenting adverse health effects at exposures below the threshold dose claimed by these agencies, which was used to establish human exposure limits. 

 

The ICBE-EMF paper “Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions,” published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health details six simple engineering fixes that could dramatically reduce radiation emitted by cellphones. The fixes are easy to implement, and in one case the fix relies on technology already patented by the industry.

About Joel M. Moskowitz Ph.D.

Joel M. Moskowitz Ph.D., has directed the Center for Family and Community Health in the School of Public Health at the University of California, Berkeley since 1993.  This presentation is entitled “Governments Downplay the Scientific Evidence of Harm from Wireless Radiation.” 

His publications include co-authoring a meta-analysis on brain cancer risk and a six-nation study of outdoor exposures to RF.  Dr. Moskowitz has translated and disseminated research on the biologic and health effects research of wireless radiation through his Electromagnetic Radiation Safety website (saferemr.com) since 2013. He also serves as a scientific advisor to Physicians for Safe Technology the International EMF Scientist Appeal.

The International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF is a multi-disciplinary consortium of scientists, doctors and researchers with expertise in the biological and health effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic field (EMF) including wireless radiation.  The health effects of cell towers, cell phones, Wi-Fi and wireless networks are a current priority for ICBE-EMF. Our experts have published numerous scientific papers on  the issue calling for more protective wireless radiation human exposure limits.